The reading passage discussed the problem of the effects of wildfire on national parks which indicating the "Let it Burn" policy to be impractical while the professor's lecture deals with the same issue and supports the "Let it Burn" policy.
The professor gives out three specific reasons to support her claim.
Firstly the reading passage states that the wildfire caused regional devastation of plant species which the land was scorched to be wastelands.
The professor countered the author's argument by pointing out that the scorched lands allow extra opportunities for smaller plants that needed light to thrive in turn increasing the diversity in Yellowstone.
The seeds that needed extra heat to open up were allowed to grow as well.
Obviously the professor's argument is more persuasive.
Moreover as the author of the reading passage suggests that the scorched lands chased away wildlife such as deer and elks the professor indicates that the smaller plants that had opportunity to grow also allowed smaller animals such as rabbits and hares to survive by feeding on those small plants.
Thus bigger predators can prey on rabbits and hares and thrive gradually thereby increasing the animal diversity in Yellow Stone.
The professor's argument definitely offered a better explanation.
Finally the professor asserts that the fire in 1988 happened because of low rainfall unexpected strong wind and the encountering of many other negative factors which are rare and such a big fire never occur ever after which in turn would not greatly affect tourism.
This argument definitely overwhelmed the author's argument that the fire lowered the tourism attraction and had negative effect on local economy.
Mason同学的TPO 20综合作文条理清晰的呈现了听力讲座对于阅读观点的反驳。
对阅读总论点和分论点的把握准确，且通过地道的用词与丰富的句式清晰地阐明了听力讲座反驳时使用的关键论据。且论证过程中逻辑清晰，论证合理。
在整个行文过程之中细节把握精准，要点完整无遗漏，值得学习！
这不仅仅因为它是七万国际部学子英语综合能力提升的成长轨迹记录，更为重要的是它能够反映出七万国际部孩子们 对世界的视角， 对社会的关注，以及 个人价值观的变化与发展。
因此，成都七中万达学校国际部鼓励学生通过写作来更多地表达自我，不仅仅是提升自我的综合能力水平，更重要的是拓展更多自我发展的路径，给予自己更多不同的新鲜观念，去接触世界文化，去洞察社会的时事，去关注内心的需求。
